from “The Guardian” Ethan Couch’s lawyer defended him by stating that he was not responsible for driving drunk and killing four people because he had “affluenza”.The legal argument dazzles. Psychological research doesn’t support it.
by Susan Bodnar
from “The Guardian” Ethan Couch’s lawyer defended him by stating that he was not responsible for driving drunk and killing four people because he had “affluenza”.The legal argument dazzles. Psychological research doesn’t support it.
Filed Under: diagnosis, diversity studies, identity, mental illness Tagged With: affluenza, does affluenza exist, Ethan Couch, is affluenza just, is affluenza real